“Where order is injustice, disorder is the beginning of justice.”
The term ‘hegemony’ means obedience through consent. All our actions are controlled by a hegemonic, internalized system of policing (………the internal policeperson inside our head……). Peace and order are not always ‘just’. The hegemonic order is maintained through a range of coercive controls. Law plays a very important role in exercising this control.
* FAMILY
The institution of ‘family’ was taken up to illustrate how this control is exercised. The popular understanding of family is always explained in terms of ‘love’, ‘solidarity’ etc. The image of family is essentially that of a ‘patriarchal’, ’heterosexual’ (nuclear) family. Legal and extra legal institutions work to maintain this essential image.
A 1984, Delhi High Court judgment observed that fundamental rights are not applicable in family. There are two ways of approaching this verdict –Dismiss the verdict and voice your contempt or understand, that letting fundamental rights into the family would be like letting a bull into a china shop! Fundamental rights such as freedom and equality would collapse the premise of ‘family’.
The next question that comes to ones mind is – why is it important to protect the ‘family’?
The institution of family is established on a patriarchal hierarchy (which is based on gender and age). Gender- based (unequal) division of labor is very important to maintain this patriarchal order. Reproduction of labor is always the domain of women. Sexual division of labor has key implication on the economy, thus the maintenance of patriarchal institution! (Just imagine … women demanding payment for their domestic work!) The primary responsibility of women is towards their homes (personal) though women also work in the public. This perception undermines the contribution made by women to the larger political economy. Thus, feminists have coined the slogan ‘personal is political!’
But is this socio-cultural formation that we see in our families, natural? No, this is not natural. The order is based on ‘upper caste north Indian norms’. We can find different (matriarchal/matrilineal) socio-cultural order among the Nair communities of Kerala, Khasi community in the north- east etc. But this heterogeneity is hardly accepted or appreciated. The accepted order is ‘heteronormative’ which is a family that consists of a man his wife and his children (……… Yeh kiska bacha hain?)
Control over women’s sexuality: Sexual double standard.
Controlling women’s sexuality is very important to maintain the above mentioned heteronormative order. Female sexuality is viewed as a threat to the popularly perceived ideas of ‘manhood’. It is interesting to note at this point that, motherhood is a biological fact and fatherhood is a ‘sociological’ construct. Among the nairs in Kerala, till the recent past, it was not important to know who the father of the child was. Heterosexuality is not natural. Heterosexual norms are made compulsory to secure the dominant order in the caste system, property rights, religious ethos etc.
Thus the above example of family helps us in delinking ‘order’ and ‘justice’.
CONFLICT AND WOMEN
The last decade of the 20th century and the first decade of the 21st century have seen acts of land acquisition by the state. Communities are getting displaced and dispossessed from their commonly owned resources. Commonly owned resources are increasingly turning into private properties of corporates. The notorious Armed Forces Special Powers Act implemented in Jammu & Kashmir and the north-eastern states is an example of ‘Internal Imperialism of the state’.
At every level there is conflict. Conflict resolution is not possible without removing inequalities. Thus conflict should be seen as an effort for a new order.
There is a general assumption, which stems from the unquestioned sexual division of labor, that women have a ‘special’ role to play is peace building, which is not true.
In conflict zones women could either be victims/survivors of violence, combatants or peace activists. As peace activists there are examples where women have ‘used’ their normative portrayal. The example of mother’s front, a grass root movement against violence, in Sri Lanka amply proves this point. Mother’s front ‘used’ domesticity and maternal suffering of women to gain strength as a movement and at the same time subverted these portrayals by marching on the streets.
There are many examples where ‘maternalism’ and ‘normative portrayals’ are used ‘creatively’. Eco feminism mostly draws from sexual division of labor. Vandana Shiva conceptualizes ‘the pre dominance of masculine order to control nature and women to harness the productive capacities of both’. (…….forest by itself is not considered productive, commercial plantation in forests would make it productive!)
CONCLUSION
Thus women in conflict zones have been constantly negotiating violence and even participating in violence. Women cannot be seen as a ‘homogenous’ category.
This can be further explained with four different images of women in conflict zones-
* Hindu lower middle – class Gujarati women, making bombs in their terrace using local materials.
* A tribal Maoist woman with a gun. (…….comrade Kamala)
* Manipuri women rallying naked to protest the rape of Manorama by army personals.
* Irom Sharmila who has been fasting for the past ten years to repeal the Armed Forces Special Powers Act. She is under arrest for charges against suicide.
Interaction…….
o Feminism is a process of constantly occupying the marginal position, recognizing that we need to move from the position of marginality. The crux is to dissent all kinds of inequalities.
o There is need to ‘demystify’ marriage and rape.
-N. Shobhana.